Why do we vaccinate babies with the Hep B vaccine? There is NO scientific justification for this medical experiment!

Vaccinating infants with Hep B, a vaccine linked with brain damage, death, anaphylaxis, and autism, directly out of the womb, in a country where Hep B is not endemic, without testing the mother’s hep B status, based on bogus science, is simply criminal and ridiculous!

This article from the Journal of Pediatrics is one of the only U.S. studies done that formulated the risk analysis used to justify recommending Hep B vaccination in ALL infants in the United States.


Let’s look at the science of this recommendation if there is any 😊

That recommendation, by the way, is for all 4 million infants a year, for the past 30 years. 

If you are a fiscal impact thinker: At about $75 per Hep b vaccination series, we are talking a ballpark of $9 BILLION in healthcare costs spent in the last 30 years.

Is that a lot of money or what?

So, let’s take a look at the science we base a $9,000,000,000 recommendation on. 

The CDC Hep B Disease Surveillance Manual states, “Infants are at greatest risk, with a 90% chance of developing a chronic infection if infected at birth.”


Then, the CDC surveillance manual goes on to group all chronic Hep b carriers and their risk of liver cirrhosis and liver cancer into one statistic, citing adult surveillance for their evidence.

This is a strange tactic they use to justify vaccinating babies…

“Although the consequences of acute hepatitis B can be severe, most of the serious sequelae occur in persons in whom chronic infection develops. Chronic liver disease develops in two-thirds of these persons, and approximately 15%–25% die prematurely from cirrhosis or liver cancer. Persons with chronic HBV infection are often detected in screening programs, such as those for blood donors, pregnant women, and refugees.”

First of all, let’s check into the 90% chronic infection in infancy claim. The CDC cited, “The influence of age on the development of the hepatitis B carrier state. Lancet 1993” to support the 90% claim.


If you read this paper, you would see that the first table in that paper lists 12 global studies done that had an average age under one year old. In other words, over the entire globe, a total of 257 infants were studied to calculate the 90% chronic infection rate.

257 infants? Is that crazy or what?  That’s a ludicrous historical foundation to build a global risk analysis on. 

And on top of that, only 38 of those infants were in the United States.

So, in other words, they based their recommendation to vaccination babies with Hep B vaccines based on 38 kids!

And since we are talking about American babies, let’s look at the risk rates of this country because they are specific to societal factors, I looked up the first U.S. study listed in the table, Gerety et al. 1977.



What did the Gerety study actually say? They had 32 infants. It only differentiated by an acute infection in the mothers, not the infants, and only 17 out of 32 infants became chronic carriers. 

Twelve infants from the 18 acutely infected moms became chronic carriers. That’s 67%.

Five infants from the 12 chronic Hep b moms. That’s 42%.

Pooled together 17 infants out of 32 infants is a 53% risk in the HIGHEST risk population.

That’s not 90% or 94%. 

So, let’s think about this for a second.

You can literally grow for nine months in an amniotic sac of viral Hepatitis B fluid, be engulfed by a viral carrier’s blood and body fluid during birth, live with viral carriers, nurse off of their body, and be covered is saliva-filled-kisses from them, and ONLY HALF the time actually become chronically infected??

If you can be that intimately drenched by a viral carrier’s bodily fluids and still not acquire chronic infection 47% the time, what about the 99% of mothers who don’t have ANY hepatitis b virus, who give birth to babies and go home to non-Hep-b families? With ZERO realistic exposure to a single droplet of effectively infectious body fluid? 

This is crazy, isn’t it?

But wait! There’s more! 😊

The study found that certain viral markers displayed in infants DID NOT have the morbidity prognosis (complication risk) of the adult population.

In other words, the entire rationale for trying to eradicate the infection risk in newborns by means of vaccination in the first place is to save them from liver disease and liver cancer. But chronic Hep b infant’s morbidity prognosis is different from adult prognosis…

Why didn’t the CDC mention that in their surveillance manual? Why did they conflate adult and infant disease and fatality outcomes as if they were the same?

What kind of fake “science” has been informing us to spend 9 billion dollars to vaccinate 4 million infants annually for the last 30 years!?! 99% of whom have ZERO risk factors of hepatitis b exposure?

At the end of the day, is it just about money?

What about the health of our children? Their future?

At birth, before we give babies the hep B vaccine, we inject them with vitamin K, which has 200 times more polysorbate 80 than the Gardasil that the American College of Pediatrics was so concerned about. Why are we giving newborns 10 mg of a documented chemical known to destroy fertility and open the brain to potential assault? And now that the blood-brain-barrier is open, they follow with an injection of Hep B, which has 250 mg aluminum (another medically documented additive which causes neurological damage).

In addition, a CDC study found a 300% increased rate of autism among newborns receiving the hepatitis   B   vaccine at birth compared to those that did not. The first-ever vaccinated vs. unvaccinated pilot study which found vaccinated children had a 420% increased rate of autism and that vaccinated preterm babies had an even higher rate of autism. Children vaccinated with Hepatitis B vaccine in the first month of life, compared to children receiving no vaccines in the first month of life, had an increased risk of 829% for ADHD, 762% for autism, 638% for ADD, 565% for tics, 498% for sleep disorders, and 206% for speech delays.

Thomas Verstraeten found a dramatic link between mercury-containing hepatitis B vaccines and several neurological injuries, including autism, and prepared the study for publication.

The interesting thing is that Boyle knew that CDC had commissioned an in-house researcher, Verstraeten, to perform a vaccinated/unvaccinated study on CDC’s giant Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) in 1999.

We know that Verstraeten is now a whistleblower that has tried to tell the government that he manipulated the data.

Verstraeten found a dramatic link between mercury-containing hepatitis B vaccines and several neurological injuries, including autism and prepared the study for publication.

CDC shared Verstraeten’s analysis with the then four vaccine makers but kept it secret from the American public.

This is criminal!

CDC’s Unpublished Verstraeten Study on HepB Showed Dramatic Increased Risk of Autism (7.6X), Sleep Disorders (5X), Speech Disorders (2.1X) and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1.8X).

DTP and Tetanus Vaccinations Increase the Odds of Allergies (1.63X) in Children.

Hepatitis B Vaccines Increase the Odds for Special Education by 8.63X.

Hepatitis B Vaccines in Male Newborns Increased the Odds of Autism 3X.

Flu Shot Increases Rate of Non-Flu Infection 4.4X.

DTP Increases Mortality in Girls 10X.

Vaccination of Preemies Increased Odds of Neurodevelopmental Disorders 6.6X.

Vaccination Increases Risk of Allergic Rhinitis (30X), Allergy (3.1X), ADHD (4.2X), Autism (4.2X) Eczema (2.9X), Learning Disability (5.2X) and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (3.7X).

Polio Vaccination Increases Type I Diabetes 2.5X.

Raw CDC Data Shows Vaccination on Time with MMR Increased Odds of Autism 3.64X.

Thimerosal-Containing Hepatitis B Series Increases Odds of Autism 3.39X.

Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine Increases the Odds of Asthma 8.01X.

Thimerosal-Containing Hepatitis B Series Increases Odds of Premature Puberty 2.1X.

MMR Vaccine Increases Risk of Crohn’s Disease 3.01X and Ulcerative Colitis 2.53X.

Thimerosal Containing Hepatitis B Vaccines—When Compared to Children Vaccinated Without Thimerosal—Increased Odds of ADHD 1.9X.

Highest Levels of Thimerosal Exposure Increase Autism Risk 11.35X.

Two H1N1-Containing Influenza Vaccines Prior to and During Pregnancy Increases Miscarriage Odds by 7.7X.

H1N1 Influenza Vaccine Increases Risks of Bell’s Palsy (1.34X), Paraesthesia (1.25X) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (1.25X) in High-Risk Patients.

HPV Vaccination Increases Odds of Memory Impairment (1.23X) and Involuntary Movement (1.53X).

Thimerosal Containing Triple HepB Series in the First Six Months of Life Increases Odds of Emotional Disturbances by 2.37X.

HPV Vaccine Increases the Risk of Celiac Disease by 1.56X.

In addition, there is a connection between Hep B vaccine and developmental disability.

The article is:

“Hepatitis B triple series vaccine and developmental disability in US children aged 1–9 years” in the journal Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry Vol. 90, No. 5, September–October 2008, 997–1008

You can find the article at:


The authors state:

“This study found statistically significant evidence to suggest that boys in the United States who were vaccinated with the triple series Hepatitis B vaccine, during the time period in which vaccines were manufactured with thimerosal, were more susceptible to developmental disability than were unvaccinated boys.”

Here we go, mercury is a known agent causing neurological damage. This is not new at all!

Then, they continue:

“Studies show an association between prenatal methyl Hg exposure and poor performance on cognitive tests (Grandjean et al. 1997). Researchers found that between 316,588 and 637,233 children each year have cord blood methyl Hg levels 45.8 mg/L, a level associated with loss of IQ and a calculated corresponding loss of productivity equivalent to 8.7 billion dollars annually (Trasande, Landrigan, and Schecter 2005). Windam et al. (2006) reported an association between ambient air Hg levels and autism prevalence.”

This is scary. For decades the FDA and CDC told us that mercury was not a problem. But now we have hundreds of research articles to show that was not the case at all. It is good they removed mercury from almost all the shots but the flu vaccine.

On the other side, they replaced the mercury-based adjuvant with an aluminum one, which is maybe more toxic! They kicked the can down the road!

And they raised some questions:

“There may be additional influences not measured by this study, such as childhood exposures to other immunizations, whether an infant was first vaccinated at birth or later, as well as non-vaccine-related influences.”

We do not know if administering more vaccines at once is worse or causes more damage to the body. No study has ever been done to investigate this question.

A few years later, the same authors published another article that further supports this conclusion.

The article in question is:

“Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 1997-2002” published in the J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2010;73(24):1665-77

You can find the article at:


Journalist David Kirby appreciated the significance of the new findings, writing in the Huffington Post:

“The study will be among the first university-based population studies to suggest an association between a vaccine and an increased risk for autism. And that would be in direct contradiction to all those MMR and thimerosal studies that purportedly found no such link.”

We know today that all those big studies invalidating the connection between autism and vaccines have been fabricated to come up with the conclusion they wanted to obtain.

I do not have space and time to debunk those, but I will in future posts 😊

The two Goodman and Gallagher articles about hepatitis B shot raise many concerns.

Hepatitis B was the first vaccine introduced after Congress indemnified vaccine makers from liability in 1986.

The vaccine has a high dose of aluminum, which we know is likely a primary culprit of autism, and it’s often given to babies on day one of life, which many immunologists feel is a huge mistake.

You can read more at:

And I went over the biological mechanism and aluminum causing autism at:

Without any doubt, these two studies raise major concerns. But they support our conclusion that vaccinated kids are sicker.

To sum it up, there is NO reason at all to vaccinate our babies with Hep B, NONE! This is the most ridiculous and dangerous practice of medicine.

God bless y’all 😊

Dr. Serge

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *