More scientific perspectives on this coronavirus “epidemic”

Let’s be clear, in this era of technology and information, it is ridiculous to see people who can’t do research and think for themselves.

It concerns me that a significant portion of the population accepts everything that our governments say.

Very concerning…

But the good news, there is a big awakening!

Lately, people have asked my opinion about this “virus” and this “epidemic.”

They are realizing that something is fishy, things are not adding up with what our government says and the actual reality of it.

So, I have written a few blogs about it, from a science perspective.

For example, I talked about the PCR test which is completely fraudulent to diagnose people with this virus. There is no doubt that this test should not be used to identify someone with the virus or not.

It is interesting to me that I demonstrated, like other scientists/doctors, that this PCR is inappropriately used by doctors to diagnose someone with the virus and I got attacked by those trolls.

They used a straw man argument, which is a logical fallacy.

They gave the impression of refuting my arguments/claims while actually refuting an argument that was not even presented in the first place!

I never said that people are not dying. Obviously, they do. And they were trying to convince others that I said that this epidemic is fake, people are not dying.

But they never addressed my points. Actually, they could not because they know that they have nothing to refute them. That is why they used a fallacy, to divert the attention to something completely irrelevant!

PCR test gives fake results.

Here’s another great article that confirms my point.

“As to my knowledge “infection” is defined as the proof of an infectious agent AND the proof of multiplication of this agent inside the body (OR associated inflammatory response that can be linked to this agent). Therefore my question is: where was the specimen taken from the “asymptomatic” nurses? PCR, as we all know, just detects nucleic acids. So if multiplication cannot be proven and no local or systemic inflammatory response is given, how was “contamination” (no matter whether due to inactivated parts of MERS-CoV or even complete virus particles) ruled out? This is not a semantic question only but should impact the reported number of “cases”. This is from Prof Martin Haditsch writing in ProMED

Viruses come with DNA or RNA genomes. A positive PCR result does not prove the active replication of a virus. It does not prove infectious virus is present. This is why we prefer to talk about a virus being detected in patients using PCR. Some refer to a PCR positive result as a “viral isolate” – don’t. This should be reserved to describe eh successful growth of a virus using cell/tissue/organ culture.

We are walking platforms for viruses, bacteria, and fungi. Take a look at this paper from Eric Delwart; in 2 kids-92% of 72 samples collected weekly over more than 250-days were virus-positive (no or mild signs of disease developed during this time)! It is very likely, as we discover more diverse agents, better characterize them and develop (and use) improved capabilities, that we will learn we’re hardly ever without a passenger or 3. And yet we are not always sick – why is that?

Still today, some people believe that viruses and bacteria cause disease.

How ludicrous this concept is!

This concept is more than a hundred years old and today, science is very clear about this, it is false, not right, not supported by scientific evidence. And the whole vaccination campaign is based on this outdated concept…

If you do not believe me, you must watch this video by Dr. Virgin:

He talks about the “virome.” He states that our bodies contain millions of viruses and some viruses are actually needed and beneficial for us.

So my question is: if viruses cause diseases, why are we still alive? We should be all dead by now! 😊

This confirms what I stated last week, that this new coronavirus is not that contagious.

More articles came out lately to support this fact:

Coronavirus pandemic | Asymptomatic patients without fever cannot infect others: Health Ministry

Covid-19 Patients Not Infectious After 11 Days: Singapore Study

New NIH Study: Transmissibility of COVID-19 by Asymptomatic Carriers Is Weak

Coronavirus: No child known to have passed COVID-19 to adults, global study finds

So, this virus is not contagious and does not live on surfaces.

Then, Dr. Luc Montagnier, Nobel prize winner for the discovery of HIV, declared that this new virus was man-made.

Is he crazy or he is onto something here?

Very interesting comment coming from a Nobel prize winner…

Then, research from Italy seems to indicate that people do not die from this “virus” but from bacterial infections.

“Co-existence of coronavirus with bacterial pathogen a major cause of fatalities”

“Quoting a postmortem study on COVID-19 victims done by Italy, they said: “Autopsy studies on 38 subjects from two hospitals in Italy who died of COVID-19 were systematically analyzed. A relevant finding of the presence of platelet-fibrin-thrombosis in small pulmonary arteries, which fits into the clinical context of a ‘Coagulopathy’ was present in a majority of these patients (86.8%, 33 out of 38). And, this was the turning point in the management of COVID 19”.

“Evidence has been accumulating on the role of Chlamydia pneumoniae-a species of Gram-negative obligate intracellular pathogen (the link between virus and bacteria) which causes a spectrum of lower and upper respiratory tract infection in humans and has been implicated in etiology/ pathogenesis of artery blockage”, the duo said.”

“A widely used anti-bacterial drug Azithromycin for COVID-19 patients is giving positive results, doctors assume it is controlling the virus, but this may be a wrong notion, Dogras said, adding, Azithromycin has been used for ‘Chlamydia pneumonia’ for long.”

This antibiotic gives very good results with those patients and we know that antibiotics kill bacteria, not viruses.

So the question becomes: is there such a thing a new virus?

I believe it is an honest question.

It has never been isolated and never been shown to agree with Koch’s postulates.

Finally, there is more and more evidence to support that facial masks do not do anything. They do not protect against this virus.

This video explains it:

Here’s another link to support this:

This link provides several scientific articles to support this claim.

“In Epidemics 2017, a meta-analysis concluded that masks had a non-significant protective effect. In the Annuals of Internal Medicine, April 2020, “neither surgical nor cotton masks effectively filtered SARS-CoV-2 during coughs by affected people.”

Here’s another very interesting article:

“COMMENTARY: Masks-for-all for COVID-19 not based on sound data”

Lisa M. Brosseau, ScD and Margaret Sietsma, PhD wrote a commentary, using 52 professional references, where they state the following:

Sweeping mask recommendations—as many have proposed—will not reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission, as evidenced by the widespread practice of wearing such masks in Hubei province, China, before and during its mass COVID-19 transmission experience earlier this year. Our review of relevant studies indicates that cloth masks will be ineffective at preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission, whether worn as source control or as PPE [Personal Protective Equipment].

Overall, the body of research on mask efficacy in real-world settings is small and scattershot. And because SARS-CoV-2 was completely unknown to humanity just five (extremely long) months ago, there is no data on the efficacy of any type of mask wearing in any setting (healthcare or home) for this virus.

In sum, given the paucity of information about their performance as source control in real-world settings, along with the extremely low efficiency of cloth masks as filters and their poor fit, there is no evidence to support their use by the public or healthcare workers to control the emission of particles from the wearer.

The following article looks at the size of viral particles and if facial masks are effective

“Covid-19 Face Mask Protection – What Leaders Fail to Understand”

For many fabric materials including shirt, sheet, towel, and handkerchief, the effectiveness factor decreased with decreasing particle size from 4800 to 410 nm, indicating further decrease in the respiratory protection for virus-containing particles <410 nm.

“nm” stands for nanometre, which is one billionth of a meter or a fraction of an inch equaling 0.00000004 (four one hundred millionths) of an inch. In other words, to equal an inch, something this small would have to be placed end to end four hundred million times.

410 nanometres, then, equals 0.0000164 (one hundred, sixty-four thousandths) of an inch. Something this small would have to be placed end to end one hundred and sixty-four thousand times to equal an inch.

The size of a single coronavirus is 125 nanometers, four times smaller than the stated limit in the previous quote. This means that the size of a coronavirus is a fraction of an inch equaling 0.00000496 (496 millionths) of an inch, which means that 496 million coronaviruses stacked end to end would equal one inch. Even the tiniest grains of sand stacked 496 million times end-to-end would stretch over fifteen miles. (I encourage readers to look up the size of a virus, the size of a sand grain, and do this calculation for yourselves.)”
To summarize, there is not enough evidence for advocacy that all people must wear masks all the time, and it is proven that cotton masks can do more damage than good.

The CDC confirms that the death rate form this coronavirus is 026%, while the death rate for this flu vaccine is 0.60%

Finally, there is another great resource to learn more about this virus

God bless y’all

Dr. Serge

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *