Natural or man-made origin of SARS-CoV-2?

Have you seen this report from Dr. Yan?

She claims that the virus was man-made.

What do you think about this claim?

Below you can read several claims from this report:

“The natural origin theory, although widely accepted, lacks substantial support.”

“Nonetheless, SARS-CoV-2 shows biological characteristics that are inconsistent with a naturally occurring, zoonotic virus.”

“In this report, we describe the genomic, structural, medical, and literature evidence, which, when

considered together, strongly contradicts the natural origin theory.”

“The evidence shows that SARS-CoV- 2 should be a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a template and/or backbone.”

“We present three lines of evidence to support our contention that laboratory manipulation is part of the history of SARS-CoV-2:

i. The genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 is suspiciously similar to that of a bat coronavirus

discovered by military laboratories in the Third Military Medical University (Chongqing, China)

and the Research Institute for Medicine of Nanjing Command (Nanjing, China).

ii. The receptor-binding motif (RBM) within the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, which determines

the host specificity of the virus, resembles that of SARS-CoV from the 2003 epidemic in a

suspicious manner. Genomic evidence suggests that the RBM has been genetically manipulated.

iii. SARS-CoV-2 contains a unique furin-cleavage site in its Spike protein, which is known to greatly enhance viral infectivity and cell tropism. Yet, this cleavage site is completely absent in this particular class of coronaviruses found in nature. In addition, rare codons associated with this additional sequence suggest the strong possibility that this furin-cleavage site is not the product of natural evolution and could have been inserted into the SARS-CoV-2 genome artificially by techniques other than simple serial passage or multi-strain recombination events inside co-infected tissue cultures or animals.”

“The receptor-binding motif of SARS-CoV-2 Spike cannot be born from nature and should have been created through genetic engineering.”

‘The striking finding of EcoRI and BstEII restriction sites at either end of the SARS-CoV-2 RBM, respectively, and the fact that the same RBM region has been swapped both by Dr. Shi and by her long-term collaborator, respectively, using restriction enzyme digestion methods are unlikely a coincidence. Rather, it is the smoking gun proving that the RBM/Spike of SARS-CoV-2 is a product of genetic manipulation.”

For people not familiar with molecular biology and engineering, enzymes such as EcoRI has used to cut fragments of DNA and insert them into another piece of DNA.

The fact that those sites are present in the genome of this virus is a clear indication that the genome has been manipulated, created, engineered by humans.

“Evidence presented in this part reveals that certain aspects of the SARS-CoV-2 genome are extremely difficult to reconcile to being a result of natural evolution.”

“To engineer and create a human-targeting coronavirus, they would have to pick a bat coronavirus as the template/backbone.”

“Once they have chosen a template virus, they would first need to engineer, through molecular cloning, the Spike protein so that it can bind hACE2.”

“Second, they would use molecular cloning to introduce a furin-cleavage site at the S1/S2 junction of Spike. This manipulation, based on known knowledge60,61,65, would likely produce a strain of coronavirus that is a more infectious and pathogenic.”

“What is not thoroughly described in this report is the various evidence indicating that several

coronaviruses recently published (RaTG1318, RmYN0230, and several pangolin coronaviruses27-29,31) are highly suspicious and likely fraudulent. These fabrications would serve no purpose other than to deceive the scientific community and the general public so that the true identity of SARS-CoV-2 is hidden. Although the exclusion of details of such evidence does not alter the conclusion of the current report, we do believe that these details would provide additional support for our contention that SARS-CoV-2 is a laboratory-enhanced virus and a product of gain-of-function research. A follow-up report focusing on such additional evidence is now being prepared and will be submitted shortly.”

What this report does is to raise questions about the origin of the virus. There is no doubt that its origin is suspicious, but more questions remain to be answered.

Revelations 6:8

“I looked, and there before me was a pale horse! Its rider was named Death, and Hades was following close behind him. They were given power over a fourth of the earth to kill by sword, famine and plague, and by the wild beasts of the earth.”

God bless y’all 😊

Dr. Serge

PS. Censorship is real. Please sign up to my email update and receive now a FREE book “The Science of Detoxification and How to Properly Rid Your Body of Toxins” at

PSS. Oftentimes, parents hide their position against vaccines. They fear persecution and bullying. In the past, the mainstream media have been disrespectful toward what they like to call “anti-vaxxers.” Their way to silence an inconvenient truth should not prevail. This publication has been designed to give you arguments and strength with organized evidence-based logic and rational conclusions. This guide is a companion document to empower your desire to voice your convictions. Order it at

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *