PCR test is still used despite being a total fraud!

In 1965, scientists identified the first human coronavirus; it was associated with the common cold. The Coronavirus family, named for their crown-like appearance, currently includes 36 viruses. Within that group, there are 4 common viruses that have been causing infection in humans for more than sixty years. In addition, three pandemic coronaviruses that can infect humans: SARS, MERS, and now, SARS-CoV-2.

Every year, about 40% of respiratory illnesses are caused by these coronaviruses.

I have said it multiples times, the PCR test used to “detect” the coronavirus is a big joke!

To put it another way, the “epidemic” is based on a lie!

From a scientific perspective, we do not know who got the virus or not.

I explain in this video why the PCR is a fraud.

For people who have done PCR before, we know that we can “manipulate” the settings and obtain different results.

This is especially true when you use genomic DNA has the source of material to amplify using the PCR. In our case, scientists use genomic material to run the PCR.

Another problem is that the genomic DNA they obtain from patients’ nasal swabs is not pure. They contain all kinds of DNA from humans, bacteria, viruses, and maybe other pathogens, who knows!


The process used for COVID testing has always been deemed “an invention”, as it was never qualified as a test. This invention is called PCR, standing for a polymerase chain reaction.

The inventor of PCR, Kary B. Mullis, said: “these PCR tests cannot detect infectious free viruses at all.” That’s direct from the inventor of PCR.

The PCR was invented to merely have bits of genetic material in a sample multiply until those small broken pieces were numerous enough to see under the microscope. PCR just helps scientists observe small things in greater quantity.

In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, the entire virus (the complete genetic sequence) must be isolated in its entirety. This has not yet been done with this virus. This is correct. No complete virus has yet to be isolated and that’s supposed to be the first step before any other steps are taken in such a process that ends with a viral declaration…let alone a pandemic declaration.

In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, the entire virus (which has never been isolated for COVID) must be transferred over to another animal or human host…..and that virus MUST cause the exact same illness in the host. This has not yet been done with this virus. The coronavirus has not yet been proven to cause disease, person to person.

In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, the entire virus (which has never been isolated for coronavirus must not only infect the host with the exact same disease, you must also find the complete genetic viral sequence in the infected tissue of the host and then re-isolate the entire genetic sequence from infected tissues of the host. This has not yet been done with this virus. Disease transmission person to person has not been proven for this virus. This is the easiest criterion to organize yet it remains undone.

In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, you must also have a control group, so you can make sure that what you call a virus isn’t just regular human genetic material, shared by all humans. If you find the exact same 80% genetic material strand in the samples of healthy controls, what you’re looking at CAN’T be the cause of the disease because it’s just regular genetic material found in all humans…both sick and healthy. In order to finger any virus as the cause of someone’s illness, you need to find that particular complete viral sequence in the sick only and not in the healthy. This has not yet been done for coronavirus. Why is the gold standard of testing (having a control group) being bypassed?

In the case of this coronavirus, scientists have indeed found a string of genetic material (not a complete sequence) that shares 80% similarities with SARS-COVID (a sequence said to cause SARS) and therefore the original Chinese scientists have declared that this string of material reflects a COVID infection. (but also did that without testing any healthy people, to see if healthy people also have the same genetic material) Humans share 97% genetic material with chimpanzees, 80% genetic material with cats, and 50% genetic material with a banana, and that’s why shared genetic material IS NEVER the standard used to diagnose any disease. This is why the Tanzanian President recently found positive PCR results when he secretly tested a goat, fruit, and motor oil because most things on earth share similar genetic sequences. We share 61% genetic material with fruit flies and 85% genetic material with mice. Shared material is never good enough to declare anything as concrete in real science. To declare viral disease you always need a full 100% viral genetic match to a past 100% viral genetic sequence in the past. This so far has not been done for this virus. Why?

And what makes this testing even more confusing is that the FDA admits that “The detection of viral RNA by RT-PCR does not necessarily equate with an infectious virus.”


So, what does a “positive” test actually mean? And that’s the problem: No one knows for sure.

What about antibody testing?

The FDA says: 

Because serology testing can yield a negative test result even if the patient is actively infected (e.g., the body has not yet developed in response to the virus) or maybe falsely positive (e.g., if the antibody indicates a past infection by a different coronavirus), this type of testing should not be used to diagnose an acute or active COVID-19 infection.


There are lots of unanswered questions here. And the whole pandemic scared is based on lies.

It is time to go back to science and real science only!

God bless y’all 😊

Dr. Serge

Censorship is real. Please sign up to my email update and receive now a FREE book “The Science of Detoxification and How to Properly Rid Your Body of Toxins” at https://science.drsergegregoire.com/

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *