No science supports vaccination.

Vaccines have never been shown to work or to provide immunity for any pathogens.

As a matter of fact, there is no evidence that vaccinations benefited the human populations or contributed to the almost disappearance of infections over the last 100 years or so

These facts we have known for a while now.

But people are still brainwashed to believe that we need the whole population vaccinated in order to what they call herd immunity.

What a ridiculous concept!

We have heard a lot about herd immunity lately. They want all of us to get this coronavirus virus vaccine. They claim that it is the only way to get rid of it once and a fall! And don’t get me started on this immunity passport…

There is lots of evidence to support that inoculations do not protect one against infectious disease.

Let’s cover herd immunity and we will start with this example of failed herd immunity that happened in 2017 in Israel.

There was a small outbreak of measles in a population of a few hundred, where virtually all of them were fully vaccinated. Among them, nine got sick from measles.

The interesting thing is that all of them were fully vaccinated, as we can see by the IgG titers. IgG titers demonstrate that a person was vaccinated against a specific infection, in our case, the measles.

In other words, despite having the presence of the antibodies against the measles virus in the blood, these nine people develop the disease!

See how vaccinations are so beneficial 😊

Vaccinations will never work because the presence of antibodies in the blood of people does not guarantee immunity.

Vaccination bypasses the natural mechanisms of naturally acquired immunity.

This is a very important concept that we learn in immunology 101!

I will try to do my best to keep it simple because there is a group of people out there that do not understand this concept 😉

Humans and infectious microbes have coexisted for as long as humans have walked the earth, and the human immune system has developed an efficient way of dealing with viral and bacterial infections.

When infected with a microorganism, the body’s first line of defense is for the cellular or ‘innate’ part of the immune system to mount an inflammatory response.

This response then signals the humoral or ‘learned’ part of the immune system to produce anti-inflammatory chemicals and antibodies that resolve inflammation, so that healing can take place, and establish future resistance to re-infection. A healthy, mature immune system requires an equal balance of cellular and humoral immune system responses. A disruption in this balance can lead to the development of allergy and autoimmune disorders, including neuroimmune disorders.

Vaccination attempts to fool the body into believing it has come in contact with the real microorganism that causes infection. But vaccination does not exactly mimic the natural infection process and often bypasses cellular immunity in favor of humoral immunity.

Vaccines create temporal (short-term) antibodies ONLY. This is the sole requirement from the FDA in order to get approval to sell the vaccine.

If you read the vaccine product insert written by the pharmaceutical company that creates the vaccine, it clearly states the increase in temporal antibodies as the basis for proof the vaccine works.

That is it!

It also gives the percentage of people that had an increase in antibodies after the vaccination. Sometimes this number is quite low in the 50% range, defying any real herd immunity protection theory (a myth that we addressed last week).

Antibodies do NOT equal immunity. Period!

But science has long known that antibodies alone do NOT create real immunity. Some people with high levels of antibodies can be exposed to an illness and still get sick, while others without antibodies can be exposed and not get sick.

Dr. Merrill Chase, nicknamed the Grandfather of Immunology for his pioneering work, did clear-cut research on this issue back in the 1950s. His results are clear: antibody levels don’t determine immunity.

Dr. Merrill W. Chase was an immunologist whose research on white blood cells helped undermine the longstanding belief that antibodies alone protected the body from disease and micro-organisms. In the 1940s, experts believed that the body-mounted attacks against pathogens primarily through antibodies circulating in the bloodstream, known as humoral immunity.

But Dr. Chase found that antibodies alone cannot orchestrate the body’s immune response.

‘This was a major discovery because everyone now thinks of the immune response in two parts, and in many instances, it’s the cellular components that are more important. Before Chase, there was only humoral immunity. After him, there was humoral and cellular immunity.” – Dr. Michel Nussenzweig, professor of immunology at Rockefeller.

The immune system is a highly complex system, and science is still in its infancy, understanding how it functions.

In fact, immunology textbooks were completely rewritten recently after a University of Virginia study finally proving the link between the gut and the brain through the lymphatic system.

Before this 2014 study, immunology books were adamant there was no link.

Doctors are never taught the ingredients in vaccines, the way they disrupt the immune system, or the research proving antibodies do not create immunity.

But doctors, who are only trained to promote vaccines and not in the science of vaccination, will never tell you this.

In fact, most doctors don’t know, since their main sources of vaccine information come from pharmaceutical company representatives paid to sell the vaccine, or the CDC, a government agency that has been called out many times for taking pharmaceutical industry money and collects royalties on vaccines sales.

If vaccines create immunity, why are there multiple cases of outbreaks in vaccinated populations? Like the one that happened in Israel?

Since vaccines are given by injection, they bypass the normal immune pathway and therefore do not trigger the cellular immune system, which science shows to be the main component necessary to create immunity.

As a result, there are numerous reports of outbreaks in fully vaccinated populations, with booster shots not making a difference. Since there is no benefit of immunity with vaccines, yet the very real risk of side effects and reactions, the question is who really benefits from an outdated vaccine program?

We need to take care of the “terrain” with good nutrition. This is the only way to prevent infectious diseases.

Because we know that vaccines do not work. There are several examples in the medical literature of children being vaccinated (with titers to support this) and still get the measles for example or mumps or chickenpox or other infections.

Vaccines have failed several times!

Then, unconsciously knowing (without actually admitting it) that vaccines do not work, they claim that we need to reach herd immunity in order to save those vaccinated kids.

Do you see the logical fallacy here?

They actually admit that vaccines do not work by using this argument of herd immunity.

If vaccines worked, you would not need to reach herd immunity!

This circular reasoning cracks me up every time!

There are dozens of examples of failed herd immunity.

I have identified almost a hundred examples of failed immunity, they still believe in this concept! And they say that we are the ones who do not understand science! lol

The herd immunity theory was originally coined in 1933 by a researcher called Hedrich. He had been studying measles patterns in the US between 1900-1931 (years before any vaccine was ever invented for measles), and he observed that epidemics of the illness only occurred when less than 68% of children had developed a natural immunity to it.

This was based upon the principle that children build their own immunity after suffering from or being exposed to the disease.

So, the herd immunity theory was, in fact, about natural disease processes and nothing to do with vaccination. If 68% of the population were allowed to build their own natural defenses, there would be no raging epidemic.

Later on, vaccinologists adopted the phrase and increased the figure from 68% to 95% with NO scientific justification as to why, and then stated that there had to be 95% vaccine coverage to achieve immunity. Essentially, they took Hedrich’s study and manipulated it to promote their vaccination programs.

But this theory relies on actual immunity. And people forget vaccination, as a flawed practice, cannot create actual immunity in everyone.

After the measles vaccine was licensed in 1963, the medical community declared a goal of eradicating measles by 1967.

But 1967 came and went, and it still wasn’t gone, 1977, 1987, 2000….the dates kept getting pushed, and the result was always the same.

Meanwhile, they continued to increase the hypothesized “herd immunity threshold,” eventually winding up at the extremely high 95% you hear today.

But NO study has ever proven this concept. There is no reason as to why they chose 95%, none.

Actually, the only reason is they realized that 80% was not enough, then 90% was not enough and now they believe 95% is necessary.

Today, they are pushing 100% of the population to be vaccinated.

The reality is vaccine-induced immunity cannot create the same results that NATURAL immunity, the real basis for the theory of the herd. Therefore, herd immunity doesn’t actually apply to vaccines. 100% compliance with vaccines will never eliminate outbreaks of diseases like measles, mumps, influenza, or pertussis.

“Herd immunity” is not achievable by vaccines because.:

A) vaccine-induced antibodies wane.

B) Some people are low responders (antibodies made are low).

C) vaccine failure, the vaccine is not as effective as claimed.

D) Some vaccines give you the virus, and you shed that virus after you get vaccinated. An individual vaccinated against a disease can spread the disease when the virus or other microbes in the vaccine sheds.

E) There are outbreaks among highly vaccinated populations and the vaccinated get the disease.

Vaccine failures caused by vaccine-induced evolution are under the same natural selection. These drops in vaccine effectiveness are incited by changes in pathogen populations that the vaccines themselves directly cause. “I think the scientific community is becoming increasingly aware that vaccine resistance is a real risk,” said Dr. David Kennedy, a scientist from Penn State.

Even if 100% of our population is vaccinated for measles, it will never leave completely because of 3 reasons: primary vaccine failure, secondary vaccine failure, and risk groups that cannot be vaccinated.

  1. Primary vaccine failure is the percentage of vaccinated individuals that never produce sufficient antibodies to protect them from the disease, even with boosters (extra doses). According to Dr. Gregory Poland, this is thought to be a genetic circumstance. And this number varies depending on the vaccine: for measles, it’s as high as 10%, for mumps more than 15%, for pertussis near 20%. For influenza, because of mismatched strains, up to 75% of vaccinated people are unprotected! This means if you are a primary non-responder, you are walking around every day with a false sense of security, clinically unvaccinated for that particular disease.

    2) Secondary vaccine failure describes a concept known as waning immunity. ALL vaccines wane over time. There is not a single vaccine that creates lifelong immunity. This timeframe also varies depending on the vaccine: for pertussis (whooping cough), it is 2-3 years, for measles around 15, and everything else is somewhere in between. So, this means many of you are reading this, well, probably all of you have lost your vaccine-induced immunity for common communicable diseases.

    3) Risks groups for the vaccine, groups who cannot receive the live virus vaccine because of potential harm, include immunocompromised individuals, those allergic to particular components, pregnant women, and children under 1. According to Dr. Poland, “this leaves a large enough segment of the population susceptible and unprotected, and such cases of measles in the vaccinated will continue to occur.”

The vaccine failure for measles is 10%. In other words, even if 100% of the population is vaccinated against measles, 90% would have immunity Not enough to obtain 95%, which they keep saying is necessary for herd immunity.

The vaccine failure for mumps is 12% and DTap is 20%.

You see, even in fully vaccinated populations, the herd immunity would never ever obtainable!

But for some reason, the vaccine pushers can’t do maths. Not sure why they do not get this very elementary concept. Even my daughter, who is 10, understand this simple mathematical equation 😊

Below is a few examples of failed herd immunity.

Some cities in Russia have a vaccination rate of 98% and they are dealing with measles outbreaks.

China has a vaccination rate of more than 99% but still, they are dealing with measles outbreaks. The Chinese officials now recommend up to 5 MMR shots! Again, admitting that the vaccine does not work!

California has a vaccination rate of 98% but they are having outbreaks of measles and mumps.

1985, Texas, USA: According to an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1987, “An outbreak of measles occurred among adolescents in Corpus Christi, Texas, in the spring of 1985, even though vaccination requirements for school attendance had been thoroughly enforced.” They concluded: “We conclude that outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune.”

1985, Montana, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Epidemiology titled, “A persistent outbreak of measles despite appropriate prevention and control measures,” an outbreak of 137 cases of measles occurred in Montana. School records indicated that 98.7% of students were appropriately vaccinated, leading the researchers to conclude: “This outbreak suggests that measles transmission may persist in some settings despite appropriate implementation of the current measles elimination strategy.”

1988, Colorado, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Public Health in 1991, “early 1988 an outbreak of 84 measles cases occurred at a college in Colorado in which over 98 percent of students had documentation of adequate measles immunity … due to an immunization requirement in effect since 1986. They concluded: “…measles outbreaks can occur among highly vaccinated college populations.”

1989, Quebec, Canada: According to an article published in the Canadian Journal of Public Health in 1991, a 1989 measles outbreak was “largely attributed to incomplete vaccination coverage,” but following an extensive review, the researchers concluded “Incomplete vaccination coverage is not a valid explanation for the Quebec City measles outbreak. Indeed, about 97% of those kids were vaccinated according to the vaccination schedule.

1991-1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: According to an article published in the journal Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, in a measles outbreak from March 1991 to April 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, 76.4% of those suspected to be infected had received measles vaccine before their first birthday.

1992, Cape Town, South Africa: According to an article published in the South African Medical Journal in 1994, “[In] August 1992 an outbreak occurred, with cases reported at many schools in children presumably immunized.” Immunization coverage for measles was found to be 91%, and vaccine efficacy found to be only 79%, leading them to conclude that primary and secondary vaccine failure was a possible explanation for the outbreak.

From December 9, 1983, to January 13, 1984, 21 cases of measles occurred in Sangamon County, Illinois. Nine of the cases were confirmed serologically. The outbreak involved 16 high school students, all of whom had histories of measles vaccination after 15 months of age documented in their school health records. Of the five remaining cases, four occurred in unvaccinated preschool children, two of whom were under 15 months of age, and one case occurred in a previously vaccinated college student. The affected high school had 276 students and was in the same building as a junior high school with 135 students. A review of health records in the high school showed that all 411 students had documentation of measles vaccination on or after the first birthday, in accordance with Illinois law.

In 1990, a blood drive was conducted among the students, whom 100% were vaccinated, of Boston University a month before the campus was hit with a measles outbreak. 

Earlier this year, the Crew of U.S. Navy Ship was stroke with the mumps. The interesting thing is that 100% of them were vaccinated against it!

A study from 1988 found that within a highly vaccinated community experiencing an outbreak of measles, antibody responses to measles could be found in 100% of the unvaccinated versus only 89.2% of the vaccinated. They conclude: “A history of prior measles vaccination is not always associated with immunity nor with the presence of specific antibodies.”

What we can conclude from these studies and several others is that the MMR vaccine does not work like they claim it is.

This is not a new observation. It goes back decades, with a 1990 study published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases finding that even though 95% of a population of urban African children had measles antibodies after vaccination, vaccine efficacy was not more than 68%.

Or, take a look at another 2008 study that found that even when the measles vaccine successfully generates an elevation of measles specific antibodies 20.7% (6 out of 29) have non-protective titers. 


Another case of recently vaccinated children spreading the measle virus.

Published in 1995 in the Journal of Clinical Microbiology and titled, “Detection of Measles Virus RNA in Urine Specimens from Vaccine Recipients,” researchers analyzed urine samples from newly MMR vaccinated 15-month-old children and young adults and reported their eye-opening results as following:

  • Measles virus RNA was detected in 10 of 12 children
  • In some cases, measles virus RNA was detected as early as 1 day or as late as 14 days after the children were vaccinated
  • Measles virus RNA was also detected in the urine samples from all four of the young adults between 1 and 13 days after vaccination.

There is also evidence that those who receive the MMR vaccine can transmit it to others (known as secondary transmission).

The most well-documented example of this is from a 2011 outbreak of measles in NYC where a twice-vaccinated individual, was found to have transmitted measles to four of her contacts, two of which themselves had received two doses of MMR vaccine and had prior presumably protective measles IgG antibody results. There is another report from 1989 which indicates human-to-human transmission of vaccine strain measles.

These are historical cases (which are not exhaustive) of outbreaks occurring secondary to measles vaccine failure and shedding in up to 99% immunization compliant populations: 

In other words, vaccination does not confer herd immunity at all.

This is how science works: first, you propose a hypothesis. In our case, our hypothesis is that we need to reach at least 95% coverage to obtain herd immunity.

Second, we test this hypothesis. As we just saw, dozens of studies invalidate and disprove this hypothesis. If this hypothesis was true, and immunization of at least 95% would prevent the spread of those infectious diseases.

But the reality of it is that it’s not the case at all. Even with a coverage rate of 100% people still get infections.

The only conclusion we can reach is that the herd immunity is fake science, a false hypothesis, a way to use fear to get people vaccinated, a way to increase their profit margins, a way to brainwash people to believe the government.

Agreeing with herd immunity and defending this concept is borderline psychotic to me.

It is not scientific and just does not make sense at all.

Back in 1991, Harvard psychologist Daniel Gilbert summarized centuries of research on belief formation this way:

“People are credulous creatures who find it very easy to believe and very difficult to doubt. In fact, believing is so easy, and perhaps so inevitable, that it may be more like involuntary comprehension than it is like rational assessment.”

Revelation 18:23 

for thy merchants were the great men of the earth; for by thy sorceries were all nations deceived”

God bless y’all 😊

Dr. Serge

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *